Friday, April 28, 2006

Evaluating a Natural Fumigant for Apple Orchards

Apple growers seeking to use natural substances produced by decomposing Brassica plants to "biofumigate" their orchards may want to first consider new findings by Agricultural Research Service (ARS) scientists in Wenatchee, Wash.

Rapeseed, mustard and other Brassica species are gaining popularity in Washington and California as a natural means of controlling soilborne pests before planting time. That's because they release a variety of chemical byproducts upon decomposing--particularly isothiocynates.

But according to Mark Mazzola, mechanisms other than biofumigation are at work against Rhizoctonia solani, a fungal culprit behind apple replant disease. Mazzola is a plant pathologist with ARS' Tree Fruit Research Laboratory in Wenatchee.

Mazzola and collaborators want to improve the use of Brassicas in integrated approaches to managing replant disease, which is traditionally fought with chemical fumigants. In the Pacific Northwest, this growth-sapping affliction of young apple trees can cause diminished crop returns up to $40,000 per acre over 10 years.

In trials using ground-up rapeseed as a soil amendment, Mazzola observed that release of isothiocynates had nothing to do with Rhizoctonia control. Rather, the control stemmed from changes the rapeseed caused to the soil environment and microbes living there. Some flourished, while others perished.

For example, Pythium fungi -- another replant disease culprit -- and Streptomyces bacteria strains that produce nitric oxide both thrived. In plants, nitric oxide is an important signaling compound that musters a pest-fighting response called systemic acquired resistance.

Mazzola theorizes that Streptomyces increases resulting from rapeseed amendments stimulated this resistance response in apple tree roots, suppressing Rhizoctonia survival long after the isothiocynates had disappeared from the soil.

However, Pythium increases required chemical control with mefenoxam. Thus, Brassica\'s pest control effectiveness isn't so clear-cut, according to Mazzola, whose studies appear in the journal Plant Disease.

************************************************************************************


AGRI-INFO/APRIL 28, 2006



TITLE: EVALUATING A NATURAL FUMIGANT FOR APPLE ORCHARDS


ALAM BA NINYO NA NATUKLASAN NG MGA AGRI-EXPERT ANG MGA TANIM NA MERONG TINATAWAG NA “BIOFUMIGATION” PROPERTIES” PARA LABANAN ANG MGA PESTE SA MGA LUPANG SAKAHAN?
ITO AY DAHIL SA TAGLAY NG MGA BIOFUMIGATE PLANTS NA ITO NA “ISOTHIOCYANATES”, ISANG URI NG NATURAL CHEMICAL BYPRODUCT KAPAG NASA ANTAS NA NG DEKOMPOSISYON ANG TANIM.

KABILANG SA MGA TANIM NA ITO NA NAKAPAGLALABAS NG NATURAL CHEMICAL AY ANG RAPESEED, MUSTARD AT IBA PANG BRASSICA SPECIES.

SA PANANALIKSIK NA GINAWA NI MARK MAZZOLA, MERONG MEKANISMO KAIBA SA BIOFUMIGATION NA MAAARI DING PANLABAN SA RHIZOCTONIA SOLANI, ANG FUNGUS NA SIYANG DAHILAN NG TINATAWAG NA APPLE REPLANT DISEASE.

ITOY MATAPOS NA MAPATUNAYAN NA WALANG KAKAYANAN ANG ISOTHIOCYANATES PARA MAKONTROL ANG NATURANG FUNGUS.

MERON PANG IBANG URI NG PESTE, ANG TINATAWAG NA PYTHIUM FUNGI AT STREPTOMYCES BACTERIA NA MAITUTURING DING PROBLEMA NG MGA MAGSASAKA NG MANSANAS.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home